| Title |
Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-007-0927-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles L. Sprung, Thomas Woodcock, Peter Sjokvist, Bara Ricou, Hans-Henrik Bulow, Anne Lippert, Paulo Maia, Simon Cohen, Mario Baras, Seppo Hovilehto, Didier Ledoux, Dermot Phelan, Elisabet Wennberg, Wolfgang Schobersberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 27% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,792,175
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,964
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,109
of 94,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.