| Title |
Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mauro Oddo, Claudio Sandroni, Giuseppe Citerio, John-Paul Miroz, Janneke Horn, Malin Rundgren, Alain Cariou, Jean-François Payen, Christian Storm, Pascal Stammet, Fabio Silvio Taccone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 14 | 13% |
| United States | 12 | 11% |
| France | 10 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Argentina | 5 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 15% |
| Scientists | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 25% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 45% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 399. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#76,430
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#44
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,431
of 451,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.