↓ Skip to main content

On the Ethics of Biodiversity Models, Forecasts and Scenarios

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Bioethics Review, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
On the Ethics of Biodiversity Models, Forecasts and Scenarios
Published in
Asian Bioethics Review, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s41649-018-0069-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre Mazzega

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,632,418
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Asian Bioethics Review
#189
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,388
of 310,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Bioethics Review
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.