| Title |
A simple method for estimating excess mortality due to heat waves, as applied to the 2006 California heat wave
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-009-0060-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sumi Hoshiko, Paul English, Daniel Smith, Roger Trent |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,550,138
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#162
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,840
of 123,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.