↓ Skip to main content

Transancestral GWAS of alcohol dependence reveals common genetic underpinnings with psychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
503 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transancestral GWAS of alcohol dependence reveals common genetic underpinnings with psychiatric disorders
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, November 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41593-018-0275-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond K. Walters, Renato Polimanti, Emma C. Johnson, Jeanette N. McClintick, Mark J. Adams, Amy E. Adkins, Fazil Aliev, Silviu-Alin Bacanu, Anthony Batzler, Sarah Bertelsen, Joanna M. Biernacka, Tim B. Bigdeli, Li-Shiun Chen, Toni-Kim Clarke, Yi-Ling Chou, Franziska Degenhardt, Anna R. Docherty, Alexis C. Edwards, Pierre Fontanillas, Jerome C. Foo, Louis Fox, Josef Frank, Ina Giegling, Scott Gordon, Laura M. Hack, Annette M. Hartmann, Sarah M. Hartz, Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach, Stefan Herms, Colin Hodgkinson, Per Hoffmann, Jouke Jan Hottenga, Martin A. Kennedy, Mervi Alanne-Kinnunen, Bettina Konte, Jari Lahti, Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen, Dongbing Lai, Lannie Ligthart, Anu Loukola, Brion S. Maher, Hamdi Mbarek, Andrew M. McIntosh, Matthew B. McQueen, Jacquelyn L. Meyers, Yuri Milaneschi, Teemu Palviainen, John F. Pearson, Roseann E. Peterson, Samuli Ripatti, Euijung Ryu, Nancy L. Saccone, Jessica E. Salvatore, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Melanie Schwandt, Richard Sherva, Fabian Streit, Jana Strohmaier, Nathaniel Thomas, Jen-Chyong Wang, Bradley T. Webb, Robbee Wedow, Leah Wetherill, Amanda G. Wills, Jason D. Boardman, Danfeng Chen, Doo-Sup Choi, William E. Copeland, Robert C. Culverhouse, Norbert Dahmen, Louisa Degenhardt, Benjamin W. Domingue, Sarah L. Elson, Mark A. Frye, Wolfgang Gäbel, Caroline Hayward, Marcus Ising, Margaret Keyes, Falk Kiefer, John Kramer, Samuel Kuperman, Susanne Lucae, Michael T. Lynskey, Wolfgang Maier, Karl Mann, Satu Männistö, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Alison D. Murray, John I. Nurnberger, Aarno Palotie, Ulrich Preuss, Katri Räikkönen, Maureen D Reynolds, Monika Ridinger, Norbert Scherbaum, Marc A. Schuckit, Michael Soyka, Jens Treutlein, Stephanie Witt, Norbert Wodarz, Peter Zill, Daniel E. Adkins, Joseph M. Boden, Dorret I. Boomsma, Laura J. Bierut, Sandra A. Brown, Kathleen K. Bucholz, Sven Cichon, E. Jane Costello, Harriet de Wit, Nancy Diazgranados, Danielle M. Dick, Johan G. Eriksson, Lindsay A. Farrer, Tatiana M. Foroud, Nathan A. Gillespie, Alison M. Goate, David Goldman, Richard A. Grucza, Dana B. Hancock, Kathleen Mullan Harris, Andrew C. Heath, Victor Hesselbrock, John K. Hewitt, Christian J. Hopfer, John Horwood, William Iacono, Eric O. Johnson, Jaakko A. Kaprio, Victor M. Karpyak, Kenneth S. Kendler, Henry R. Kranzler, Kenneth Krauter, Paul Lichtenstein, Penelope A. Lind, Matt McGue, James MacKillop, Pamela A. F. Madden, Hermine H. Maes, Patrik Magnusson, Nicholas G. Martin, Sarah E. Medland, Grant W. Montgomery, Elliot C. Nelson, Markus M. Nöthen, Abraham A. Palmer, Nancy L. Pedersen, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Bernice Porjesz, John P. Rice, Marcella Rietschel, Brien P. Riley, Richard Rose, Dan Rujescu, Pei-Hong Shen, Judy Silberg, Michael C. Stallings, Ralph E. Tarter, Michael M. Vanyukov, Scott Vrieze, Tamara L. Wall, John B. Whitfield, Hongyu Zhao, Benjamin M. Neale, Joel Gelernter, Howard J. Edenberg, Arpana Agrawal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 427 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 13%
Student > Master 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 7%
Other 24 6%
Other 88 21%
Unknown 118 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 17%
Psychology 52 12%
Neuroscience 41 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 7%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 130 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 283. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#126,129
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#185
of 5,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,444
of 446,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.