| Title |
2018 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandeep R. Das, Brendan M. Everett, Kim K. Birtcher, Jenifer M. Brown, William T. Cefalu, James L. Januzzi, Rita Rastogi Kalyani, Mikhail Kosiborod, Melissa L. Magwire, Pamela B. Morris, Laurence S. Sperling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 370 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 82 | 22% |
| Spain | 54 | 15% |
| Mexico | 21 | 6% |
| Colombia | 15 | 4% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Peru | 8 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 7 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 7 | 2% |
| Chile | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 124 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 245 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 17% |
| Scientists | 49 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 69 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 330. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#102,411
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#227
of 16,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,957
of 448,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#4
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.