↓ Skip to main content

Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Neurology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 4,068)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
300 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1655 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
Published in
Lancet Neurology, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30403-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

GBD 2016 Dementia Collaborators, Emma Nichols, Cassandra E I Szoeke, Stein Emil Vollset, Nooshin Abbasi, Foad Abd-Allah, Jemal Abdela, Miloud Taki Eddine Aichour, Rufus O Akinyemi, Fares Alahdab, Solomon W Asgedom, Ashish Awasthi, Suzanne L Barker-Collo, Bernhard T Baune, Yannick Béjot, Abate B Belachew, Derrick A. Bennett, Belete Biadgo, Ali Bijani, Muhammad Shahdaat Bin Sayeed, Carol Brayne, David O Carpenter, Félix Carvalho, Ferrán Catalá-López, Ester Cerin, Jee-Young J Choi, Anh Kim Dang, Meaza G Degefa, Shirin Djalalinia, Manisha Dubey, Eyasu Ejeta Duken, David Edvardsson, Matthias Endres, Sharareh Eskandarieh, Andre Faro, Farshad Farzadfar, Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad, Eduarda Fernandes, Irina Filip, Florian Fischer, Abadi K Gebre, Demeke Geremew, Maryam Ghasemi-Kasman, Elena V. Gnedovskaya, Rajeev Gupta, Vladimir Hachinski, Tekleberhan B Hagos, Samer Hamidi, Graeme J. Hankey, Josep M Haro, Simon I Hay, Seyed Sina N Irvani, Ravi P Jha, Jost B. Jonas, Rizwan Kalani, André Karch, Amir Kasaeian, Yousef Saleh Khader, Ibrahim A Khalil, Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Tripti Khanna, Tawfik A M Khoja, Jagdish Khubchandani, Adnan Kisa, Katarzyna Kissimova-Skarbek, Mika Kivimäki, Ai Koyanagi, Kristopher J Krohn, Giancarlo Logroscino, Stefan Lorkowski, Marek Majdan, Reza Malekzadeh, Winfried März, João Massano, Getnet Mengistu, Atte Meretoja, Moslem Mohammadi, Maryam Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, Ali H Mokdad, Stefania Mondello, Ghobad Moradi, Gabriele Nagel, Mohsen Naghavi, Gurudatta Naik, Long H Nguyen, Trang H Nguyen, Yirga L Nirayo, Molly R Nixon, Richard Ofori-Asenso, Felix A Ogbo, Andrew T Olagunju, Mayowa O Owolabi, Songhomitra Panda-Jonas, Valéria M de Azeredo Passos, David M. Pereira, Gabriel D Pinilla-Monsalve, Michael A Piradov, Constance D Pond, Hossein Poustchi, Mostafa Qorbani, Amir Radfar, Robert C Reiner, Stephen R Robinson, Gholamreza Roshandel, Ali Rostami, Tom C Russ, Perminder S Sachdev, Hosein Safari, Saeid Safiri, Ramesh Sahathevan, Yahya Salimi, Maheswar Satpathy, Monika Sawhney, Mete Saylan, Sadaf G. Sepanlou, Azadeh Shafieesabet, Masood A Shaikh, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Mika Shigematsu, Rahman Shiri, Ivy Shiue, João P Silva, Mari Smith, Soheila Sobhani, Dan J Stein, Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos, Marcos R Tovani-Palone, Bach X Tran, Tung Thanh Tran, Amanuel T Tsegay, Irfan Ullah, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Vasily Vlassov, Yuan-Pang Wang, Jordan Weiss, Ronny Westerman, Tissa Wijeratne, Grant M.A. Wyper, Yuichiro Yano, Ebrahim M Yimer, Naohiro Yonemoto, Mahmoud Yousefifard, Zoubida Zaidi, Zohreh Zare, Theo Vos, Valery L. Feigin, Christopher J L Murray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 300 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 285 13%
Student > Master 269 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 235 10%
Researcher 222 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 100 4%
Other 324 14%
Unknown 809 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 341 15%
Neuroscience 222 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 176 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 4%
Other 408 18%
Unknown 907 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 583. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#40,844
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#32
of 4,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#752
of 448,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.