↓ Skip to main content

From legacy encodings to Unicode: the graphical and logical principles in the scripts of South Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Language Resources and Evaluation, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
From legacy encodings to Unicode: the graphical and logical principles in the scripts of South Asia
Published in
Language Resources and Evaluation, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10579-006-9003-7
Authors

Andrew Hardie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 3 43%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Language Resources and Evaluation
#239
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,857
of 90,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Resources and Evaluation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them