↓ Skip to main content

Fc-dependent functions are redundant to efficacy of anti-HIV antibody PGT121 in macaques

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fc-dependent functions are redundant to efficacy of anti-HIV antibody PGT121 in macaques
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, November 2018
DOI 10.1172/jci122466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew S. Parsons, Wen Shi Lee, Anne B. Kristensen, Thakshila Amarasena, Georges Khoury, Adam K. Wheatley, Arnold Reynaldi, Bruce D. Wines, P. Mark Hogarth, Miles P. Davenport, Stephen J. Kent

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,516,387
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#9,479
of 16,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,189
of 447,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#82
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.