↓ Skip to main content

Gustatory synergism in ants mediates a species-specific symbiosis with lycaenid butterflies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Gustatory synergism in ants mediates a species-specific symbiosis with lycaenid butterflies
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00359-008-0375-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaru K. Hojo, Ayako Wada-Katsumata, Mamiko Ozaki, Susumu Yamaguchi, Ryohei Yamaoka

Abstract

Here we show that larvae of the lycaenid butterfly Niphanda fusca secrete droplets containing trehalose and glycine. These droplets attract the larva's host ants Camponotus japonicus, which collect and protect the larvae. We comparatively investigated gustatory preference for trehalose, glycine or a mixture of the two between host (C. japonicus) and non-host (Camponotus obscuripes) species of ants in behavioral and electrophysiological experiments. Glycine itself induced no taste sensation in either host or non-host ants. The mixture of trehalose plus glycine was chosen as much as pure trehalose by non-host ants. However, the host ants clearly preferred the mixture of trehalose plus glycine to trehalose alone. When we used sucrose instead of trehalose, the mixture of sucrose plus glycine was chosen as much as sucrose alone, in both species. These behavioral data are supported by the electrophysiological responsiveness to sugars and/or glycine in the sugar-taste receptor cells of the ants. Considering that lycaenid butterflies' secretions have species-specific compositions of sugar and amino acid; our results clearly showed that such species-specific compositions of larval secretions are precisely tuned to the feeding preferences of their host ant species, in which the feeding preferences are synergistically enhanced by amino acid.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
French Guiana 1 2%
Unknown 42 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 72%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,065,859
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#962
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,358
of 91,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.