| Title |
New Latonia (Amphibia: Alytidae) from the late Miocene of northern Caucasus (Russia)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12549-018-0350-3 |
| Authors |
Elena Syromyatnikova, Zbyněk Roček |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,579,758
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#123
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,659
of 437,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.