↓ Skip to main content

Chest-rubbing in captive woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha)

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Chest-rubbing in captive woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha)
Published in
Primates, April 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02557799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brent C. White, Stephanie E. Dew, James R. Prather, MaryJo Stearns, Eric Schneider, Steve Taylor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Student > Master 10 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 66%
Psychology 4 11%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,579,758
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,006
of 39,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them