↓ Skip to main content

Informing randomized clinical trials of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination during pregnancy to prevent recurrent childhood wheezing: A sample size analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informing randomized clinical trials of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination during pregnancy to prevent recurrent childhood wheezing: A sample size analysis
Published in
Vaccine, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinne A. Riddell, Niranjan Bhat, Louis J. Bont, William D. Dupont, Daniel R. Feikin, Deshayne B. Fell, Tebeb Gebretsadik, Tina V. Hartert, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Ruth A. Karron, Harish Nair, Robert C. Reiner, Ting Shi, Peter D. Sly, Renato T. Stein, Pingsheng Wu, Heather J. Zar, Justin R. Ortiz, for the WHO Technical Working Group on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination During Pregnancy to Prevent Recurrent Childhood Wheezing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,203,221
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#1,827
of 16,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,827
of 446,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#34
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.