| Title |
Macroseismic effects highlight site response in Rome and its geological signature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-012-0085-9 |
| Authors |
Paola Sbarra, Valerio De Rubeis, Emiliano Di Luzio, Marco Mancini, Massimiliano Moscatelli, Francesco Stigliano, Patrizia Tosi, Roberto Vallone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 54% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,811,856
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#687
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,623
of 245,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.