↓ Skip to main content

Protect, accommodate, retreat or avoid (PARA): Canadian community options for flood disaster risk reduction and flood resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 2,162)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Protect, accommodate, retreat or avoid (PARA): Canadian community options for flood disaster risk reduction and flood resilience
Published in
Natural Hazards, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3529-z
Authors

Brent Doberstein, Joanne Fitzgibbons, Carrie Mitchell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 55 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 29 17%
Engineering 22 13%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Arts and Humanities 11 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 62 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#492,653
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#36
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,810
of 451,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.