↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating response distances to develop buffer zones for staging terns
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.21594
Authors

Melissa A. Althouse, Jonathan B. Cohen, Sarah M. Karpanty, Jeffrey A. Spendelow, Kayla L. Davis, Katharine C. Parsons, Cristin F. Luttazi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 33%
Environmental Science 6 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,553,484
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,875
of 2,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,284
of 446,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.