| Title |
Impact of deprescribing rounds on discharge prescriptions: an interventional trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-018-0753-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Edey, Nicholas Edwards, Jonah Von Sychowski, Ajay Bains, Jim Spence, Dan Martinusen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 26% |
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| Spain | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,503,738
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#39
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,380
of 449,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.