You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and binding mode of a novel Leishmania Trypanothione reductase inhibitor from high throughput screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006969 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Turcano, Esther Torrente, Antonino Missineo, Matteo Andreini, Marina Gramiccia, Trentina Di Muccio, Ilaria Genovese, Annarita Fiorillo, Steven Harper, Alberto Bresciani, Gianni Colotti, Andrea Ilari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 17 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,001,700
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#4,089
of 9,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,677
of 445,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#82
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.