| Title |
Efficacy of vitamin C for the prevention and treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. A meta-analysis in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00228-018-2601-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Vorilhon, Bastien Arpajou, Hélène Vaillant Roussel, Étienne Merlin, Bruno Pereira, Aurélie Cabaillot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 14% |
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#670,119
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#27
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,793
of 452,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.