| Title |
Goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a 15-year follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1869-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Rhodes, Maurizio Cecconi, Mark Hamilton, Jan Poloniecki, Justin Woods, Owen Boyd, David Bennett, R. Michael Grounds |
| Abstract |
Goal-directed therapy in the perioperative setting has been shown to be associated with short-term improvements in outcome. This study assesses the longer-term survival of patients from a previous randomized controlled trial of goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 37 | 28% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 78% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2010.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,992
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,077
of 94,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.