↓ Skip to main content

Positioning of bone marrow hematopoietic and stromal cells relative to blood flow in vivo: serially reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells reside in distinct nonperfused niches

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Positioning of bone marrow hematopoietic and stromal cells relative to blood flow in vivo: serially reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells reside in distinct nonperfused niches
Published in
Blood, April 2010
DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-07-233437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid G. Winkler, Valérie Barbier, Robert Wadley, Andrew C.W. Zannettino, Sharon Williams, Jean-Pierre Lévesque

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niches have been reported at the endosteum or adjacent to bone marrow (BM) vasculature. To investigate functional attributes of these niches, mice were perfused with Hoechst 33342 (Ho) in vivo before BM cell collection in presence of pump inhibitors and antibody stained. We report that the position of phenotypic HSCs, multipotent and myeloid progenitors relative to blood flow, follows a hierarchy reflecting differentiation stage, whereas mesenchymal stromal cells are perivascular. Furthermore, during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced mobilization, HSCs migrated closer to blood flow, whereas stromal cells did not. Interestingly, phenotypic Lin(-)Sca1(+)KIT(+)CD41(-)CD48(-)CD150(+) HSCs segregated into 2 groups (Ho(neg) or Ho(med)), based on degree of blood/Ho perfusion of their niche. HSCs capable of serial transplantation and long-term bromodeoxyuridine label retention were enriched in Ho(neg) HSCs, whereas Ho(med) HSCs cycled more frequently and only reconstituted a single host. This suggests that the most potent HSC niches are enriched in locally secreted factors and low oxygen tension due to negligible blood flow. Importantly, blood perfusion of niches correlates better with HSC function than absolute distance from vasculature. This technique enables prospective isolation of serially reconstituting HSCs distinct from other less potent HSCs of the same phenotype, based on the in vivo niche in which they reside.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 180 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 29%
Researcher 43 23%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#7,028
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,710
of 102,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#74
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.