| Title |
The WATCH AF Trial: SmartWATCHes for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.10.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcus Dörr, Vivien Nohturfft, Noé Brasier, Emil Bosshard, Aleksandar Djurdjevic, Stefan Gross, Christina J Raichle, Mattias Rhinisperger, Raphael Stöckli, Jens Eckstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 9 | 17% |
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Argentina | 4 | 8% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 70% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 30% |
| Engineering | 18 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 94 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#392,752
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#38
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,466
of 449,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.