↓ Skip to main content

A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00134-009-1467-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnaud W. Thille, Aissam Lyazidi, Jean-Christophe M. Richard, Fabrice Galia, Laurent Brochard

Abstract

To compare 13 commercially available, new-generation, intensive-care-unit (ICU) ventilators in terms of trigger function, pressurization capacity during pressure-support ventilation (PSV), accuracy of pressure measurements, and expiratory resistance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 120 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 17 13%
Other 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 61%
Engineering 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,397,965
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,986
of 5,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,565
of 94,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.