↓ Skip to main content

Accumulation of JAK activation loop phosphorylation is linked to type I JAK inhibitor withdrawal syndrome in myelofibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accumulation of JAK activation loop phosphorylation is linked to type I JAK inhibitor withdrawal syndrome in myelofibrosis
Published in
Science Advances, November 2018
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aat3834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denis Tvorogov, Daniel Thomas, Nicholas P. D. Liau, Mara Dottore, Emma F. Barry, Maya Lathi, Winnie L. Kan, Timothy R. Hercus, Frank Stomski, Timothy P. Hughes, Vinay Tergaonkar, Michael W. Parker, David M. Ross, Ravindra Majeti, Jeffrey J. Babon, Angel F. Lopez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Chemistry 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#10,547
of 12,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,001
of 446,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#195
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.