↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of methods for reporting inorganic element concentrations and radioactivity in oil and gas wastewaters from the Appalachian Basin, U.S. based on an inter-laboratory comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of methods for reporting inorganic element concentrations and radioactivity in oil and gas wastewaters from the Appalachian Basin, U.S. based on an inter-laboratory comparison
Published in
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2019
DOI 10.1039/c8em00359a
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. L. Tasker, W. D. Burgos, M. A. Ajemigbitse, N. E. Lauer, A. V. Gusa, M. Kuatbek, D. May, J. D. Landis, D. S. Alessi, A. M. Johnsen, J. M. Kaste, K. L. Headrick, F. D. H. Wilke, M. McNeal, M. Engle, A. M. Jubb, R. D. Vidic, A. Vengosh, N. R. Warner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 21%
Chemistry 5 11%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#1,279
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,359
of 446,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#78
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.