| Title |
Editorial Special Topic: Neuroethical Issues in Cognitive Enhancement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41465-018-0117-9 |
| Authors |
Andrea Lavazza, Lorenza S. Colzato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,995,216
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,512
of 440,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them