↓ Skip to main content

ASO Author Reflections: Quality of Life After HIPEC for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Quality of Life After HIPEC for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6898-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam T. Stearns, Sarah T. O’Dwyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,532,842
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,845
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,568
of 348,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#79
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.