↓ Skip to main content

Verification of the possibility and effectiveness of experiential learning using HMD-based immersive VR technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Verification of the possibility and effectiveness of experiential learning using HMD-based immersive VR technologies
Published in
Virtual Reality, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10055-018-0364-1
Authors

Chongsan Kwon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Lecturer 18 8%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 76 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 30 13%
Social Sciences 29 13%
Arts and Humanities 13 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Engineering 11 5%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 87 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#397
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,801
of 346,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.