| Title |
Retraction Note to: Erratum to: Application of extreme learning machine for estimation of wind speed distribution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-018-4551-2 |
| Authors |
Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Kasra Mohammadi, Chong Wen Tong, Dalibor Petković, Emilio Porcu, Ali Mostafaeipour, Sudheer Ch, Ahmad Sedaghat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,998,207
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,065
of 4,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,843
of 437,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#47
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.