↓ Skip to main content

Modification of MHC Anchor Residues Generates Heteroclitic Peptides That Alter TCR Binding and T Cell Recognition

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modification of MHC Anchor Residues Generates Heteroclitic Peptides That Alter TCR Binding and T Cell Recognition
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, August 2010
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1000629
Pubmed ID
Authors

David K. Cole, Emily S. J. Edwards, Katherine K. Wynn, Mathew Clement, John J. Miles, Kristin Ladell, Julia Ekeruche, Emma Gostick, Katherine J. Adams, Ania Skowera, Mark Peakman, Linda Wooldridge, David A. Price, Andrew K. Sewell

Abstract

Improving T cell Ags by altering MHC anchor residues is a common strategy used to enhance peptide vaccines, but there has been little assessment of how such modifications affect TCR binding and T cell recognition. In this study, we use surface plasmon resonance and peptide-MHC tetramer binding at the cell surface to demonstrate that changes in primary peptide anchor residues can substantially and unpredictably alter TCR binding. We also demonstrate that the ability of TCRs to differentiate between natural and anchor-modified heteroclitic peptides distinguishes T cells that exhibit a strong preference for either type of Ag. Furthermore, we show that anchor-modified heteroclitic peptides prime T cells with different TCRs compared with those primed with natural Ag. Thus, vaccination with heteroclitic peptides may elicit T cells that exhibit suboptimal recognition of the intended natural Ag and, consequently, impaired functional attributes in vivo. Heteroclitic peptide-based immune interventions therefore require careful evaluation to ensure efficacy in the clinic.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 30%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 13%
Chemistry 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,599,559
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#3,747
of 27,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,778
of 95,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#38
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.