| Title |
Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-018-3536-0 |
| Authors |
Haoyuan Hong, Himan Shahabi, Ataollah Shirzadi, Wei Chen, Kamran Chapi, Baharin Bin Ahmad, Majid Shadman Roodposhti, Arastoo Yari Hesar, Yingying Tian, Dieu Tien Bui |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 14% |
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,332,054
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#383
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,552
of 437,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.