You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature08883 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharina F. Ettwig, Margaret K. Butler, Denis Le Paslier, Eric Pelletier, Sophie Mangenot, Marcel M. M. Kuypers, Frank Schreiber, Bas E. Dutilh, Johannes Zedelius, Dirk de Beer, Jolein Gloerich, Hans J. C. T. Wessels, Theo van Alen, Francisca Luesken, Ming L. Wu, Katinka T. van de Pas-Schoonen, Huub J. M. Op den Camp, Eva M. Janssen-Megens, Kees-Jan Francoijs, Henk Stunnenberg, Jean Weissenbach, Mike S. M. Jetten, Marc Strous |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,614 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 3% |
| Germany | 14 | <1% |
| Japan | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1493 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 420 | 26% |
| Researcher | 319 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 197 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 124 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 81 | 5% |
| Other | 238 | 15% |
| Unknown | 235 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 459 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 297 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 166 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 143 | 9% |
| Engineering | 79 | 5% |
| Other | 152 | 9% |
| Unknown | 318 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,248,863
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35,400
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,019
of 106,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#153
of 621 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 621 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.