| Title |
An analysis of research priority-setting at the World Health Organization – how mapping to a standard template allows for comparison between research priority-setting approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0391-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. F. Terry, E. Charles, B. Purdy, A. Sanford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Senegal | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,638,321
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#161
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,349
of 449,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.