| Title |
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Laycock, Gillian Harvey, Nikki Percival, Frances Cunningham, Jodie Bailie, Veronica Matthews, Kerry Copley, Louise Patel, Ross Bailie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,504,649
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#598
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,208
of 437,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#29
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.