| Title |
Understanding the microbial basis of body odor in pre-pubescent children and teenagers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0588-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tze Hau Lam, Davide Verzotto, Purbita Brahma, Amanda Hui Qi Ng, Ping Hu, Dan Schnell, Jay Tiesman, Rong Kong, Thi My Uyen Ton, Jianjun Li, May Ong, Yang Lu, David Swaile, Ping Liu, Jiquan Liu, Niranjan Nagarajan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Singapore | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 88 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#529,747
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#137
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,798
of 451,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#7
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.