| Title |
Social media as a tool for assessing patient perspectives on quality of life in metastatic melanoma: a feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-018-1047-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amr Makady, Rachel R. J. Kalf, Bettina Ryll, Gilliosa Spurrier, Anthonius de Boer, Hans Hillege, Olaf H. Klungel, Wim Goettsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,856,453
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#218
of 2,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,551
of 437,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.