| Title |
A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Nau, E. Christopher Ellison, Peter Muscarella, Dean Mikami, Vimal K. Narula, Bradley Needleman, W. Scott Melvin, Jeffrey W. Hazey |
| Abstract |
The methodology of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has been validated in both human and animal models. Herein is a discussion of our experience gained from the initial 130 patients enrolled in transgastric pre-NOTES and NOTES protocols at our institution. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 56% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2010.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,770
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,329
of 99,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.