You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Heterozygosity for Nuclear Factor One X in mice models features of Malan syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
EBioMedicine, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.044 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sabrina Oishi, Danyon Harkins, Nyoman D. Kurniawan, Maria Kasherman, Lachlan Harris, Oressia Zalucki, Richard M. Gronostajski, Thomas H.J. Burne, Michael Piper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 31% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 5 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 24% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,083,782
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#1,397
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,635
of 446,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#34
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.