| Title |
Assessment of spatial learning and memory in the Barnes maze task in rodents—methodological consideration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00210-018-1589-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kinga Gawel, Ewa Gibula, Marta Marszalek-Grabska, Joanna Filarowska, Jolanta H. Kotlinska |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 355 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 110 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 93 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 127 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,715,749
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#50
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,074
of 451,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.