| Title |
A method for estimating colony sizes of Adélie penguins using remote sensing imagery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Polar Biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00300-014-1451-8 |
| Authors |
M. A. LaRue, H. J. Lynch, P. O. B. Lyver, K. Barton, D. G. Ainley, A. Pollard, W. R. Fraser, G. Ballard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,431,532
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#1,176
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,651
of 306,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.