You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emerging investigator series: radium accumulation in carbonate river sediments at oil and gas produced water discharges: implications for beneficial use as disposal management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c8em00336j |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bonnie McDevitt, Molly McLaughlin, Charles A. Cravotta, Moses A. Ajemigbitse, Katherine J. Van Sice, Jens Blotevogel, Thomas Borch, Nathaniel R. Warner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,936,902
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#104
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,397
of 449,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#7
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.