↓ Skip to main content

Genetic determinants and an epistasis of LILRA3 and HLA-B*52 in Takayasu arteritis

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic determinants and an epistasis of LILRA3 and HLA-B*52 in Takayasu arteritis
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1808850115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chikashi Terao, Hajime Yoshifuji, Takayoshi Matsumura, Taeko K. Naruse, Tomonori Ishii, Yoshikazu Nakaoka, Yohei Kirino, Keitaro Matsuo, Tomoki Origuchi, Masakazu Shimizu, Yasuhiro Maejima, Eisuke Amiya, Natsuko Tamura, Takahisa Kawaguchi, Meiko Takahashi, Kazuya Setoh, Koichiro Ohmura, Ryu Watanabe, Tetsuya Horita, Tatsuya Atsumi, Mitsuru Matsukura, Tetsuro Miyata, Yuta Kochi, Toshio Suda, Kazuo Tanemoto, Akira Meguro, Yukinori Okada, Akiyoshi Ogimoto, Motohisa Yamamoto, Hiroki Takahashi, Shingo Nakayamada, Kazuyoshi Saito, Masataka Kuwana, Nobuhisa Mizuki, Yasuharu Tabara, Atsuhisa Ueda, Issei Komuro, Akinori Kimura, Mitsuaki Isobe, Tsuneyo Mimori, Fumihiko Matsuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Unspecified 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#19,337,766
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#95,933
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,835
of 447,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#817
of 903 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 903 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.