| Title |
Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1843-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gustavo Ospina-Tascon, Ana Paula Neves, Giovanna Occhipinti, Katia Donadello, Gustavo Büchele, Davide Simion, Maria-Luisa Chierego, Tatiana Oliveira Silva, Adriana Fonseca, Jean-Louis Vincent, Daniel De Backer |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effects of fluid administration on microcirculatory alterations in sepsis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 227 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 12% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 78 | 33% |
| Unknown | 28 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 179 | 75% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,173
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,283
of 104,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#31
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.