Title |
Evidence gaps and biodiversity threats facing the marine environment of the United Kingdom’s Overseas Territories
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1660-5 |
Authors |
Bethan C. O’Leary, Philip Fieldhouse, Colin J. McClean, Adriana E. S. Ford, Polly Burns, Julie P. Hawkins, Callum M. Roberts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 32% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 68% |
Scientists | 11 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,606,585
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#215
of 2,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,051
of 446,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.