You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is high vitamin B12 status a cause of lung cancer?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ijc.32033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anouar Fanidi, Robert Carreras‐Torres, Tricia L. Larose, Jian‐Min Yuan, Victoria L. Stevens, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Demetrius Albanes, Ross Prentice, Mary Pettinger, Qiuyin Cai, William J. Blot, Alan A. Arslan, Anne Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Marjorie L. McCullough, Loic Le Marchand, Lynne R. Wilkens, Christopher A. Haiman, Xuehong Zhang, Meir J. Stampfer, Stephanie A. Smith‐Warner, Edward Giovannucci, Graham G. Giles, Allison M. Hodge, Gianluca Severi, Mikael Johansson, Kjell Grankvist, Arnulf Langhammer, Ben M. Brumpton, Renwei Wang, Yu‐Tang Gao, Ulrika Ericson, Stig E. Bojesen, Susanne M. Arnold, Woon‐Puay Koh, Xiao‐Ou Shu, Yong‐Bing Xiang, Honglan Li, Wei Zheng, Qing Lan, Kala Visvanathan, Judith Hoffman‐Bolton, Per M. Ueland, Øivind Midttun, Neil E. Caporaso, Mark Purdue, Neal D. Freedman, Julie E. Buring, I‐Min Lee, Howard D. Sesso, J. Michael Gaziano, Jonas Manjer, Caroline L. Relton, Rayjean J. Hung, Chris I. Amos, Mattias Johansson, Paul Brennan, on behalf of the LC3 consortium and the TRICL consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Germany | 4 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#479,825
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#145
of 12,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,121
of 466,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#9
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.