| Title |
Measuring Sarcopenia Severity in Older Adults and the Value of Effective Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-018-1104-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna P. MacEwan, T.M. Gill, K. Johnson, J. Doctor, J. Sullivan, J. Shim, D.P. Goldman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,259,870
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#539
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,956
of 352,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.