↓ Skip to main content

The plasma peptidome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Proteomics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The plasma peptidome
Published in
Clinical Proteomics, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12014-018-9211-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaimie Dufresne, Pete Bowden, Thanusi Thavarajah, Angelique Florentinus-Mefailoski, Zhuo Zhen Chen, Monika Tucholska, Tenzin Norzin, Margaret Truc Ho, Morla Phan, Nargiz Mohamed, Amir Ravandi, Eric Stanton, Arthur S. Slutsky, Claudia C. dos Santos, Alexander Romaschin, John C. Marshall, Christina Addison, Shawn Malone, Daren Heyland, Philip Scheltens, Joep Killestein, Charlotte Teunissen, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, K. W. M. Siu, John G. Marshall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 30%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,274,324
of 24,874,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#70
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,289
of 448,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,874,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.