↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for a Heritable Predisposition to Death Due to Influenza

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for a Heritable Predisposition to Death Due to Influenza
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2008
DOI 10.1086/524064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick S. Albright, Patricia Orlando, Andrew T. Pavia, George G. Jackson, Lisa A. Cannon Albright

Abstract

Animal model studies and human epidemiological studies have shown that some infectious diseases develop primarily in individuals with an inherited predisposition. A heritable contribution to the development of severe influenza virus infection (i.e., that which results in death) has not previously been hypothesized or tested. Evidence for a heritable contribution to death due to influenza was examined using a resource consisting of a genealogy of the Utah population linked to death certificates in Utah over a period of 100 years. The relative risks of death due to influenza were estimated for the relatives of 4,855 individuals who died of influenza. Both close and distant relatives of individuals who died of influenza were shown to have a significantly increased risk of dying of influenza, consistent with a combination of shared exposure and genetic effects. These data provide strong support for a heritable contribution to predisposition to death due to influenza.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Vietnam 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 61 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,914,962
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1,442
of 14,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,469
of 168,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#16
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.