↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of kinesin evolution reveal a complex ancestral eukaryote with a multifunctional cytoskeleton

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of kinesin evolution reveal a complex ancestral eukaryote with a multifunctional cytoskeleton
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bill Wickstead, Keith Gull, Thomas A Richards

Abstract

The genesis of the eukaryotes was a pivotal event in evolution and was accompanied by the acquisition of numerous new cellular features including compartmentalization by cytoplasmic organelles, mitosis and meiosis, and ciliary motility. Essential for the development of these features was the tubulin cytoskeleton and associated motors. It is therefore possible to map ancient cell evolution by reconstructing the evolutionary history of motor proteins. Here, we have used the kinesin motor repertoire of 45 extant eukaryotes to infer the ancestral state of this superfamily in the last common eukaryotic ancestor (LCEA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 138 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 28%
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,957,714
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#476
of 3,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,785
of 105,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.