↓ Skip to main content

Screening methods for delirium: don't get confused!

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Screening methods for delirium: don't get confused!
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00134-006-0400-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kees H. Polderman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 9 30%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,580,144
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,883
of 5,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,268
of 69,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.